NIRMALA vs KARIYAPPA — 255/2020
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section UO7R1AND2CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS610015962020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
257/2020
Filing Date
05-11-2020
Registration No
255/2020
Registration Date
05-11-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIRMALA
Adv. C T NAGARAJU
Respondent(s)
KARIYAPPA
MANJULA
MANJUNATHA
Hearing History
Judge: 452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against the defendants regarding a property dispute. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish clear possession of the disputed property or prove the alleged interference by the defendants, as she could not provide documentary evidence establishing the property's exact boundaries and measurements, nor did she produce title documents to support her ownership claims. The defendants, in contrast, presented government grant certificates and revenue records proving their legal rights over the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction against the defendants regarding a property dispute. The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish clear possession of the disputed property or prove the alleged interference by the defendants, as she could not provide documentary evidence establishing the property's exact boundaries and measurements, nor did she produce title documents to support her ownership claims. The defendants, in contrast, presented government grant certificates and revenue records proving their legal rights over the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts