RAVISHKUMAR vs MURTHY N. — 356/2023

Case under Under Section 200 Crpc R/w 138 and 142 of Ni Act Section 138NI. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS610011952023

Filing Number

357/2023

Filing Date

28-Jul-2023

Registration No

356/2023

Registration Date

28-Jul-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section 200 Crpc R/w 138 and 142 of Ni Act Section 138NI

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVISHKUMAR

    Adv. N KARUNAKARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MURTHY N.

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  7. 18-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 356/2023 (RAVISHKUMAR v. MURTHY N.) The court examined the testimony of PW-1 (first witness) on 24.09.2025 regarding a financial transaction. The witness testified that he gave 10 lakhs rupees to the accused (Murthy) in April 2023, who provided two cheques in return. One cheque was dishonored (insufficient funds), and the second was returned with signature mismatch. The witness also stated he provided ginger (turmeric) valued at approximately ₹60,000-75,000 to the accused for a business venture, though details regarding distribution remain unclear. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  11. 12-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  12. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  13. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  14. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  15. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  16. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  17. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  18. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  19. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  20. 28-Aug-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  22. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  23. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  24. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  25. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  26. 07-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  27. 18-Dec-2023

    Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  28. 18-Oct-2023

    Hbc

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  29. 15-Sep-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  30. 28-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 28-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 356/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 356/2023 (RAVISHKUMAR v. MURTHY N.) The court examined the testimony of PW-1 (first witness) on 24.09.2025 regarding a financial transaction. The witness testified that he gave 10 lakhs rupees to the accused (Murthy) in April 2023, who provided two cheques in return. One cheque was dishonored (insufficient funds), and the second was returned with signature mismatch. The witness also stated he provided ginger (turmeric) valued at approximately ₹60,000-75,000 to the accused for a business venture, though details regarding distribution remain unclear. The case was adjourned for continuation of cross-examination by the opposing counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case