S M PREMKUMAR vs MAHESHA — 447/2020

Case under Under Section 200 Crpc R/w 138 and 142 of Ni Act Section US138NIACT. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS610011872020

JUDGMENTS

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

451/2020

Filing Date

08-09-2020

Registration No

447/2020

Registration Date

08-09-2020

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

Acts & Sections

UNDER SECTION 200 CRPC R/W 138 AND 142 OF NI ACT Section US138NIACT

Petitioner(s)

S M PREMKUMAR

Adv. B NATARAJ

Respondent(s)

MAHESHA

Hearing History

Judge: 452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

01-04-2026

JUDGMENTS

17-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

03-03-2026

EVIDENCE

28-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

14-08-2023
Deposition
26-09-2025
Deposition
13-10-2025
Deposition
27-10-2025
Deposition
22-11-2025
Deposition
25-02-2026
Deposition
17-03-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a civil court order (C.C. No. 447/2020) from Piriyapatna regarding witness examination (DW-3) in a cheque-related dispute. The court rejected the witness's testimony, finding that the witness (a Bank of Baroda assistant manager) gave false evidence regarding whether a cheque was incomplete and appeared to have colluded with the accused in providing dishonest testimony. The witness's credibility was discredited on multiple grounds, including contradictions about the cheque's validity and the witness's authority to testify. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil court order (C.C. No. 447/2020) from Piriyapatna regarding witness examination (DW-3) in a cheque-related dispute. The court rejected the witness's testimony, finding that the witness (a Bank of Baroda assistant manager) gave false evidence regarding whether a cheque was incomplete and appeared to have colluded with the accused in providing dishonest testimony. The witness's credibility was discredited on multiple grounds, including contradictions about the cheque's validity and the witness's authority to testify. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case