BETTADAPURA PS vs SWAMY — 703/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 447,341,504,506,34. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS610010342022
Filing Number
703/2022
Filing Date
26-Feb-2022
Registration No
703/2022
Registration Date
26-Feb-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
204
Police Station
BETTADAPURA PS
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BETTADAPURA PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SWAMY
-
2.NAGARAJU
-
3.KRISHNA
-
4.YOGESHA
-
5.DEVAMMA
-
6.SAKAMMA
-
7.PUTTAMMA
-
8.KALAMMA
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Arguments
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
15-Jun-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
09-Jun-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
18-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: CC.703/2022 In this civil case before the 1st Additional Civil Judge and District Court in Piriyapatna, a witness (50-year-old farmer) testified that he knew nothing about the case involving accused persons and had witnessed nothing. The prosecution sought to treat him as a hostile witness and cross-examine him. The court permitted this. The witness's statement was recorded as Exhibit P1. The accused had no lawyer present and no further examination was conducted. The case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
13-Oct-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
29-May-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
14-Dec-2024
Call on
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
02-Dec-2024
A.D.R.
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
25-Oct-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
29-Aug-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
15-Jul-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
14-Jun-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
13-May-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
11-Mar-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
30-Jan-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
08-Jan-2024
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
04-Dec-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
17-Oct-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
12-Sep-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
24-Jul-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
15-Jun-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
17-May-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
10-Apr-2023
Hbc
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Feb-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
06-Oct-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
14-Jun-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
26-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 703/2022
Case Summary: CC.703/2022 In this civil case before the 1st Additional Civil Judge and District Court in Piriyapatna, a witness (50-year-old farmer) testified that he knew nothing about the case involving accused persons and had witnessed nothing. The prosecution sought to treat him as a hostile witness and cross-examine him. The court permitted this. The witness's statement was recorded as Exhibit P1. The accused had no lawyer present and no further examination was conducted. The case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts