GIRISH N.R. vs KRISHNA Advocate - PRASANNA .A — 263/2019
Case under Under Section 200 Crpc R/w 138 and 142 of Ni Act Section 138NIACT. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS610009712019
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
265/2019
Filing Date
29-03-2019
Registration No
263/2019
Registration Date
29-03-2019
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRISH N.R.
Adv. K BHASKARA
Respondent(s)
KRISHNA Advocate - PRASANNA .A
Hearing History
Judge: 1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case Number: CC. 263/2019-DW-1 Date: 28/03/2026 This is a civil case involving a cheque dishonor dispute. The defendant (witness) testified that he borrowed Rs. 2 lakhs from the plaintiff, repayable in 4 installments, and issued a cheque from Kaveri Gramin Bank dated 20.12.2017. The cheque was presented through Vijaya Bank but was dishonored on 02.01.2018 due to insufficient funds. The defendant admitted to issuing the cheque but gave contradictory testimony regarding his signature and knowledge of the transaction. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which included conflicting statements about the cheque issuance and his residence details. No final order/judgment is evident from this excerpt — the document appears to contain only the examination-in-chief portion of witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case Number: CC. 263/2019-DW-1 Date: 28/03/2026 This is a civil case involving a cheque dishonor dispute. The defendant (witness) testified that he borrowed Rs. 2 lakhs from the plaintiff, repayable in 4 installments, and issued a cheque from Kaveri Gramin Bank dated 20.12.2017. The cheque was presented through Vijaya Bank but was dishonored on 02.01.2018 due to insufficient funds. The defendant admitted to issuing the cheque but gave contradictory testimony regarding his signature and knowledge of the transaction. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which included conflicting statements about the cheque issuance and his residence details. No final order/judgment is evident from this excerpt — the document appears to contain only the examination-in-chief portion of witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts