GOWRAMMA vs SWAMYNAIKA — 171/2020
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc Section UO7R1AND2CPC. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS610006592020
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
110/2020
Filing Date
19-03-2020
Registration No
171/2020
Registration Date
24-08-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOWRAMMA
Adv. S SHIVANNEGOWDA, T S RAJENDRA
Respondent(s)
SWAMYNAIKA
CHANDRANAIKA
Adv. C K MANJUNATH
SUNDARA
Adv. Exparte
CHANDRA
PREMA
Adv. C K MANJUNATH
RAJESHA
Adv. C K MANJUNATH
SHEKHARA
Adv. C K MANJUNATH
Hearing History
Judge: 452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In OS 171/2020, the court conducted cross-examination of the defendant witness (DW-1) on 24.03.2026 and found the witness testimony to be unreliable and inconsistent. The court determined that Exhibit 3 (NI-3) is a fabricated document created specifically for this case, containing discrepancies regarding ward numbers and lacking proper authentication by officials. The court held that the document is inadmissible and irrelevant to the case, and noted deficiencies in the witness's credibility throughout the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In OS 171/2020, the court conducted cross-examination of the defendant witness (DW-1) on 24.03.2026 and found the witness testimony to be unreliable and inconsistent. The court determined that Exhibit 3 (NI-3) is a fabricated document created specifically for this case, containing discrepancies regarding ward numbers and lacking proper authentication by officials. The court held that the document is inadmissible and irrelevant to the case, and noted deficiencies in the witness's credibility throughout the examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts