SYED JAPHAR vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 160/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS610005012026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SYED JAPHAR

    Adv. B G SATISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Summary of Case 160/2026 The court allowed 85-year-old Syed Jaffar's petition to register his birth, which occurred on 01.01.1940 but was never registered due to ignorance of legal procedures. Based on the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and notarized Aadhar card), the court found sufficient grounds under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahashildar to register his birth details and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 160/2026 The court allowed 85-year-old Syed Jaffar's petition to register his birth, which occurred on 01.01.1940 but was never registered due to ignorance of legal procedures. Based on the petitioner's testimony and supporting documents (non-availability certificate and notarized Aadhar card), the court found sufficient grounds under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahashildar to register his birth details and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case