BASAVARAJU vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 103/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS610003312026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS ACT Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

BASAVARAJU

Adv. GIRISH KUMAR S.M.

DHANYA

Respondent(s)

THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.

Hearing History

Judge: 452-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

07-03-2026

Disposed

26-02-2026

ORDERS

05-02-2026

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Orders

The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar to register the birth of 17-year-old Dhanya (born 28.07.2008) in the register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. The court found the petitioners proved their case through testimonial evidence and supporting documents (Aadhar card, SSLC marks card, G-tree) establishing the date and place of birth, noting that late registration is permissible under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969 with judicial approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar to register the birth of 17-year-old Dhanya (born 28.07.2008) in the register and issue a birth certificate upon payment of prescribed fees. The court found the petitioners proved their case through testimonial evidence and supporting documents (Aadhar card, SSLC marks card, G-tree) establishing the date and place of birth, noting that late registration is permissible under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births & Deaths Act, 1969 with judicial approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case