SWAMYNAYAKA vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 91/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS610002862026

Filing Number

91/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

91/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWAMYNAYAKA

    Adv. C S MANJUNATHASWAMY

  2. 2.S K VEERAPPA

  3. 3.LAKKAMMA

  4. 4.JAYAMMA

  5. 5.GOWRAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: 91/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition and directed the Tahsildar of Periyapatna to register the death of Narasamma (died 16.08.1995) in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged evidence that their mother's death was never registered, finding no intentional delay, and determined that complying with the petition would serve justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 91/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 91/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition and directed the Tahsildar of Periyapatna to register the death of Narasamma (died 16.08.1995) in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate. The court accepted the petitioners' unchallenged evidence that their mother's death was never registered, finding no intentional delay, and determined that complying with the petition would serve justice without prejudicing the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case