SHAILA vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 13/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS610000592026
Filing Number
13/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAILA
Adv. S.N.GIRISHA
-
2.VASEGOWDA
-
3.NAGAMMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of late Gowramma (died 05.01.2016) in the official register. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and published notice, sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not recorded by the respondent, making the petitioners liable to pay applicable late registration fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
04-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
28-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2026
The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of late Gowramma (died 05.01.2016) in the official register. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged testimony, supported by a non-availability certificate and published notice, sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not recorded by the respondent, making the petitioners liable to pay applicable late registration fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts