KRISHNAPPA vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 12/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS610000582026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNAPPA
Adv. H D GOVINDEGOWDA
SOMEGOWDA
THIMMAMMA
Respondent(s)
THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.
Hearing History
Judge: 1319-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 28-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sannamma (wife of late Somegowda) who died on 18.02.1980 in Bekkare Village, Periyapatna Taluk, Mysuru District. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by the non-availability certificate and other documents sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not available in the register. The respondent was directed to enter the death particulars after obtaining applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sannamma (wife of late Somegowda) who died on 18.02.1980 in Bekkare Village, Periyapatna Taluk, Mysuru District. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by the non-availability certificate and other documents sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not available in the register. The respondent was directed to enter the death particulars after obtaining applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts