KRISHNAPPA vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 12/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 08th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS610000582026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
12/2026
Registration Date
07-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1319-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNAPPA
Adv. H D GOVINDEGOWDA
-
2.SOMEGOWDA
-
3.THIMMAMMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sannamma (wife of late Somegowda) who died on 18.02.1980 in Bekkare Village, Periyapatna Taluk, Mysuru District. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by the non-availability certificate and other documents sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not available in the register. The respondent was directed to enter the death particulars after obtaining applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
04-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
28-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2026
Summary The court allowed the petition filed under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, directing the Tahsildar to register the death of Sannamma (wife of late Somegowda) who died on 18.02.1980 in Bekkare Village, Periyapatna Taluk, Mysuru District. The court found the petitioner's unchallenged testimony corroborated by the non-availability certificate and other documents sufficient to establish that the death particulars were not available in the register. The respondent was directed to enter the death particulars after obtaining applicable late fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts