NAGARAJU vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 4/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS610000352026
Filing Number
4/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGARAJU
Adv. M J SWAMY
-
2.ANNAIAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Periyapatna court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar to register the death of the petitioners' grandfather, Eranna S/o Helavegowda, who died on 01.05.1995, in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners' claims credible, accepted their unchallenged affidavit evidence due to the respondent's non-appearance, and concluded that registering the death would serve justice without causing hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
21-Jan-2026
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
06-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Summary The Periyapatna court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar to register the death of the petitioners' grandfather, Eranna S/o Helavegowda, who died on 01.05.1995, in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners' claims credible, accepted their unchallenged affidavit evidence due to the respondent's non-appearance, and concluded that registering the death would serve justice without causing hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts