NAGARAJU vs THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA. — 3/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS610000342026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

452-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAGARAJU

    Adv. M J SWAMY

  2. 2.ANNAIAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASHILDAR PERIYAPATNA.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar of Periyapatna to register the death of the petitioners' grandmother, Changalamma (who died on 10.01.1995), in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate upon payment of applicable fees. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged claims credible since the respondent remained absent, and determined that registering the belated death entry would serve justice without causing any hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 21-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahasildhar of Periyapatna to register the death of the petitioners' grandmother, Changalamma (who died on 10.01.1995), in the births and deaths register and issue a death certificate upon payment of applicable fees. The court found the petitioners' unchallenged claims credible since the respondent remained absent, and determined that registering the belated death entry would serve justice without causing any hardship to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case