KURSHID K.S vs THE TAHASILDAR — 273/2025

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section U,SEC,13(3),OF,BIRTH,AND,DEATH,ACT. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Orders Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS600015802025

Filing Number

273/2025

Filing Date

02-Dec-2025

Registration No

273/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

1123-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section U,SEC,13(3),OF,BIRTH,AND,DEATH,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KURSHID K.S

    Adv. K KANTHA RAJU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In CMIS No. 273/2025, the court heard witness PW-01 on 07.03.2026, who was sworn in and testified regarding the petition. Five exhibits were admitted into evidence, including a non-availability certificate, revenue inspector's report, G-tree copy, death certificate of the witness's mother Fathima, and Aadhaar card. The court found no cross-examination by the opposing party and granted the petition as requested by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 273/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CMIS No. 273/2025, the court heard witness PW-01 on 07.03.2026, who was sworn in and testified regarding the petition. Five exhibits were admitted into evidence, including a non-availability certificate, revenue inspector's report, G-tree copy, death certificate of the witness's mother Fathima, and Aadhaar card. The court found no cross-examination by the opposing party and granted the petition as requested by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case