RAJEGOWDA vs YOGESHA — 22/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43 RULE 1. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.
M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals
CNR: KAMS600012222023
Filing Number
22/2023
Filing Date
20-Sep-2023
Registration No
22/2023
Registration Date
21-Sep-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1123-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 10-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJEGOWDA
Adv. I R SRINIVASA
-
2.T.T.JAGADEESHA
-
3.RAMESHA
-
4.SURESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.YOGESHA
-
2.RAVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgment
Summary The Senior Civil Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, modifying the trial court's dismissal of their temporary injunction application. The court found that the appellants established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed agricultural property based on a registered 1997 partition deed, and that the balance of convenience favored them. However, rather than granting full injunction, the court ordered both parties to maintain status quo regarding the suit property until final disposal of the case, recognizing the respondents' claimed agricultural access rights while protecting the appellants' possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
16-Feb-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
23-Jan-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
19-Jan-2026
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
11-Dec-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Nov-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
13-Oct-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
09-Sep-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
19-Aug-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
09-Jul-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
25-Apr-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
27-Mar-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
27-Feb-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
07-Feb-2025
Judgement
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
06-Feb-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
10-Jan-2025
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
29-Nov-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
21-Nov-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
25-Oct-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
10-Sep-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
08-Aug-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
12-Jul-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
15-Jun-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
19-Apr-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
02-Apr-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
04-Mar-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
12-Feb-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
10-Jan-2024
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
01-Dec-2023
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
09-Nov-2023
Call on
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna
-
21-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2023
Summary The Senior Civil Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, modifying the trial court's dismissal of their temporary injunction application. The court found that the appellants established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed agricultural property based on a registered 1997 partition deed, and that the balance of convenience favored them. However, rather than granting full injunction, the court ordered both parties to maintain status quo regarding the suit property until final disposal of the case, recognizing the respondents' claimed agricultural access rights while protecting the appellants' possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts