RAJEGOWDA vs YOGESHA — 22/2023

Summary The Senior Civil Judge partly allowed the appellants' appeal, modifying the trial court's dismissal of their temporary injunction application. The court found that the appellants established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed agricultural property based on a registered 1997 partition deed, and that the balance of convenience favored them. However, rather than granting full injunction, the court ordered both parties to maintain status quo regarding the suit property until final disposal of the case, recognizing the respondents' claimed agricultural access rights while protecting the appellants' possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.