PAVAN KUMAR @ PAVAN vs SHEIK ASLAM — 2126/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS600011592024
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2124/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
2126/2024
Registration Date
26-09-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PAVAN KUMAR @ PAVAN
Adv. K.R.VIJAY
Respondent(s)
SHEIK ASLAM
THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 18-10-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-09-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Vehicles Case (MVC No. 2126/2024) from a Kannada court documenting the examination of PW-01 (plaintiff/claimant) on 07.03.2026. The witness, a Tobacco Board field assistant, testified about a motorcycle accident on a national highway where he sustained injuries requiring hospitalization across multiple facilities. The witness claims he was following traffic rules and wearing a helmet, and seeks compensation for medical expenses and lost wages. The court cross-examined his testimony regarding the accident circumstances, his employment, and medical documentation, with the case continuing for further proceedings and cross-examination completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Vehicles Case (MVC No. 2126/2024) from a Kannada court documenting the examination of PW-01 (plaintiff/claimant) on 07.03.2026. The witness, a Tobacco Board field assistant, testified about a motorcycle accident on a national highway where he sustained injuries requiring hospitalization across multiple facilities. The witness claims he was following traffic rules and wearing a helmet, and seeks compensation for medical expenses and lost wages. The court cross-examined his testimony regarding the accident circumstances, his employment, and medical documentation, with the case continuing for further proceedings and cross-examination completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts