CANARA BANK vs RAJANAYAKA — 64/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section MONEYSUIT. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 07th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS600004602025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

65/2025

Filing Date

02-04-2025

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

02-04-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section MONEYSUIT

Petitioner(s)

CANARA BANK

Adv. ROHITH B.J.

Respondent(s)

RAJANAYAKA

MAHADEVAMMA

HANUMANTHA NAYAKA

YOGANAYAKA

SWAMYNAYAKA

GEETHA R

PRAKASHA

Hearing History

Judge: 1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA

07-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The Senior Civil Judge at Periyapatna decreed Canara Bank's suit against the defendants for recovery of Rs. 17,11,074/- with interest at 11.50% per annum. The court found that the defendants had borrowed agricultural crop loans and Kissan OD loans in 2015, executed necessary mortgage and security documents, and defaulted on repayment despite repeated demands. The defendants were placed ex parte for non-appearance, and the bank's documentary evidence remained unchallenged, establishing the loan obligations and default conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

20-01-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Senior Civil Judge at Periyapatna decreed Canara Bank's suit against the defendants for recovery of Rs. 17,11,074/- with interest at 11.50% per annum. The court found that the defendants had borrowed agricultural crop loans and Kissan OD loans in 2015, executed necessary mortgage and security documents, and defaulted on repayment despite repeated demands. The defendants were placed ex parte for non-appearance, and the bank's documentary evidence remained unchallenged, establishing the loan obligations and default conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case