RAJESH H.R vs VENKATESHA P.J — 525/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS600003312024
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
551/2024
Filing Date
05-03-2024
Registration No
525/2024
Registration Date
05-03-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA
Judge
1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH H.R
Adv. PARAMESH M.P
Respondent(s)
VENKATESHA P.J
DEVENDRA P
THE MANAGER, SRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 1123-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC PIRIYAPATNA
ORDERS
ORDERS
To hear on IA
for Objection
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 17-01-2026 | To hear on IA | |
| 22-11-2025 | for Objection | |
| 27-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 525/2024, the court examined witness PW-01's testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 09.06.2023. After recording the witness's statement on 27.09.2025, the court identified significant discrepancies in the evidence, including contradictions regarding the vehicle involved in the accident, insurance documentation, and the witness's credibility. The case appears to be pending further proceedings, with the court noting inconsistencies in the accident details and documentary evidence presented by both the claimant and the second respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 525/2024, the court examined witness PW-01's testimony regarding a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 09.06.2023. After recording the witness's statement on 27.09.2025, the court identified significant discrepancies in the evidence, including contradictions regarding the vehicle involved in the accident, insurance documentation, and the witness's credibility. The case appears to be pending further proceedings, with the court noting inconsistencies in the accident details and documentary evidence presented by both the claimant and the second respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts