DANDAMMA vs RATHNAMMA.S.K — 11/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43RULE1(R). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

M.A. - Miscellanuous Appeals

CNR: KAMS600002772025

Filing Number

11/2025

Filing Date

01-Mar-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

03-Mar-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

1123-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43RULE1(R)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DANDAMMA

    Adv. MADHUSUDANA K J

  2. 2.JAYAMMA

  3. 3.MAHADEVA MURTHY

  4. 4.MANJULA

  5. 5.NATESHA

  6. 6.SATHISHA

  7. 7.SHIVAKUMAR

  8. 8.SAVITHA

  9. 9.DEEPIKA.S.S

  10. 10.ABHIJITH.S.S

  11. 11.THAMMAIAH

  12. 12.SWAMY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHNAMMA.S.K

  2. 2.SUNANDAMMA

  3. 3.TEJASWINI

  4. 4.JAYANNA

  5. 5.RAVIKUMAR

  6. 6.KUMAR

  7. 7.KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: MA.11/2025 The Senior Civil Judge at Periyapatna allowed the appellants' appeal against the trial court's dismissal of their temporary injunction application. The appellants (descendants of Late Elliyyaiah) claimed ownership of ancestral property supported by joint khatha (land record) issued in 2024, RTCs from 1996-2024, tax receipts, and encumbrance certificates. The court found the appellants had established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, rejected the trial court's reasoning that boundary disputes precluded injunction (as the parties' properties had distinctly different northern boundaries), and granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the appellants' possession pending suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  9. 13-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  10. 18-Jun-2025

    Call on

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  11. 03-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 01-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MA.11/2025 The Senior Civil Judge at Periyapatna allowed the appellants' appeal against the trial court's dismissal of their temporary injunction application. The appellants (descendants of Late Elliyyaiah) claimed ownership of ancestral property supported by joint khatha (land record) issued in 2024, RTCs from 1996-2024, tax receipts, and encumbrance certificates. The court found the appellants had established a prima facie case of ownership and possession, rejected the trial court's reasoning that boundary disputes precluded injunction (as the parties' properties had distinctly different northern boundaries), and granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the appellants' possession pending suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case