GOVINDANAYAKA vs MANJESHWARA — 122/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-May-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS600000822025

e-Filing Number

10-01-2025

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

10-Jan-2025

Registration No

122/2025

Registration Date

13-Jan-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PERIYAPATNA

Judge

1123-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

Last updated 10-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDANAYAKA

    Adv. SUDHEESHA K B

  2. 2.GOVINDA NAYAKA

    Adv. SUDHEESHA K B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANJESHWARA

  2. 2.IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Case History

  1. 02-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    In MVC No. 122/2025, the court examined witness PW-01 on 07.03.2026, who was sworn and affirmed the truthfulness of their statement. The court admitted exhibits including certified copies of the FIR, complaint, and spot mahazar into evidence. The case was adjourned for the defense counsel to present arguments during the main hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  5. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  6. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  7. 03-Jul-2025

    IssueView PDF

  8. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  9. 23-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Piriyapatna

  10. 05-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MVC No. 122/2025, the court examined witness PW-01 on 07.03.2026, who was sworn and affirmed the truthfulness of their statement. The court admitted exhibits including certified copies of the FIR, complaint, and spot mahazar into evidence. The case was adjourned for the defense counsel to present arguments during the main hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case