STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL P.S. vs Rajanna — 9051/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,324,34,341,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510131722022
e-Filing Number
22-11-2022
Filing Number
9058/2022
Filing Date
22-Nov-2022
Registration No
9051/2022
Registration Date
22-Nov-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0066
Police Station
NANJANAGUD RURAL PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL P.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajanna
-
2.Thejokar
-
3.Lakshmi
-
4.Mahadeva J P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 9051/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Rajanna, Thejokar, Lakshmi, and Mahadev) of charges under IPC sections 341, 354, 324, 323, and 506 with section 34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the alleged offenses. The two primary witnesses—the complainant (PW1) and another witness (PW2)—testified that they had reached a settlement/compromise with the accused. Their testimony did not support the prosecution's case, as both witnesses stated no actual assault occurred and no threats were made. The court found that without credible incriminating evidence from these crucial witnesses, the prosecution could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Feb-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Dec-2025
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Sep-2025
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-May-2025
ChargeView PDF
-
12-May-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Mar-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Feb-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
25-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Oct-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Jul-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Apr-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Dec-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Sep-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Mar-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Mar-2023
Appearance Of Accussed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
29-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 9051/2022
Case Summary: 9051/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Rajanna, Thejokar, Lakshmi, and Mahadev) of charges under IPC sections 341, 354, 324, 323, and 506 with section 34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the alleged offenses. The two primary witnesses—the complainant (PW1) and another witness (PW2)—testified that they had reached a settlement/compromise with the accused. Their testimony did not support the prosecution's case, as both witnesses stated no actual assault occurred and no threats were made. The court found that without credible incriminating evidence from these crucial witnesses, the prosecution could not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts