KUMARI vs ANUSHA — 8952/2022
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 1. Status: Further Evidence. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510127682022
Filing Number
8956/2022
Filing Date
25-Oct-2022
Registration No
8952/2022
Registration Date
25-Oct-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUMARI
Adv. S. BHIKAMCHAND JAIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANUSHA
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Further Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-May-2026
Further Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Further Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Feb-2026
Further Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
30-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: C.C. No. 8952/2022 Petitioner: Kumari | Respondent: Anusha Outcome: The witness examination was completed on 30.01.2026. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding a cheque bounce case involving a ₹6 lakh loan. The petitioner testified that respondent Anusha never actually advanced the loan; the cheque (No. 213783) was obtained fraudulently to recover unrelated debts. The court found no valid loan transaction existed and that respondent failed to establish financial capacity to have given such a loan. The petition was dismissed, as the petitioner's complaint lacked legal merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Jan-2026
Further Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Jan-2026
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
28-Nov-2025
Await Reports
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
31-Oct-2025
Await Reports
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Sep-2025
Await Reports
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
29-Aug-2025
Await Reports
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jul-2025
Await Reports
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Jun-2025
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Apr-2025
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Apr-2025
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Feb-2025
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Jan-2025
PleaView PDF
-
24-Jan-2025
Cross Of Pw/Dw
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Nov-2024
NBW To Accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Aug-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
15-Jun-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Mar-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Feb-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Dec-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Nov-2023
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Nov-2023
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Oct-2023
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Aug-2023
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Aug-2023
NBW To Accused
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jun-2023
Summons
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Apr-2023
Steps
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Feb-2023
Steps
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 8952/2022
Case Summary: C.C. No. 8952/2022 Petitioner: Kumari | Respondent: Anusha Outcome: The witness examination was completed on 30.01.2026. The court recorded the petitioner's testimony regarding a cheque bounce case involving a ₹6 lakh loan. The petitioner testified that respondent Anusha never actually advanced the loan; the cheque (No. 213783) was obtained fraudulently to recover unrelated debts. The court found no valid loan transaction existed and that respondent failed to establish financial capacity to have given such a loan. The petition was dismissed, as the petitioner's complaint lacked legal merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts