MAHADEVAMMA vs MAHADEVAMMA — 449/2022

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 7R1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS510124322022

Filing Number

434/2022

Filing Date

22-Sep-2022

Registration No

449/2022

Registration Date

23-Sep-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAMMA

    Adv. M. BEEREGOWDA

  2. 2.KUMARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAMMA

  2. 2.SAKAMMA

  3. 3.KALAMMA

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The witness examination was concluded on 09.01.2026 in O.S. No. 449/2022. The court found the witness testimony unreliable, noting contradictions in evidence regarding the plaintiff's alleged marriage to one Kālegouda, including lack of documentary proof and inconsistencies about witnesses and details. The court concluded the witness was providing false testimony to assist the plaintiffs, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 23-Oct-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 20-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 11-Jul-2025

    Further Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 05-Jun-2025

    Further Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 04-Apr-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 07-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 07-Feb-2025

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 19-Dec-2024

    Further Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 19-Sep-2024

    Further Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 27-Jun-2024

    Further Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 18-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 17-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 22-Feb-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 22-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 14-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 27-Feb-2023

    IssueView PDF

  30. 27-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 24-Feb-2023

    Issues

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 06-Jan-2023

    For Complainance

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 03-Dec-2022

    For Written Statement

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  34. 04-Nov-2022

    For Written Statement

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  35. 23-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 22-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 449/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The witness examination was concluded on 09.01.2026 in O.S. No. 449/2022. The court found the witness testimony unreliable, noting contradictions in evidence regarding the plaintiff's alleged marriage to one Kālegouda, including lack of documentary proof and inconsistencies about witnesses and details. The court concluded the witness was providing false testimony to assist the plaintiffs, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case