MAHADEVAMMA vs MAHADEVAMMA — 449/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 7R1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510124322022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
434/2022
Filing Date
22-09-2022
Registration No
449/2022
Registration Date
23-09-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHADEVAMMA
Adv. M. BEEREGOWDA
KUMARA
Respondent(s)
MAHADEVAMMA
SAKAMMA
KALAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 449-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
CROSS OF PW/DW
CROSS OF PW/DW
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 20-11-2025 | CROSS OF PW/DW | |
| 23-10-2025 | CROSS OF PW/DW |
Interim Orders
The witness examination was concluded on 09.01.2026 in O.S. No. 449/2022. The court found the witness testimony unreliable, noting contradictions in evidence regarding the plaintiff's alleged marriage to one Kālegouda, including lack of documentary proof and inconsistencies about witnesses and details. The court concluded the witness was providing false testimony to assist the plaintiffs, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The witness examination was concluded on 09.01.2026 in O.S. No. 449/2022. The court found the witness testimony unreliable, noting contradictions in evidence regarding the plaintiff's alleged marriage to one Kālegouda, including lack of documentary proof and inconsistencies about witnesses and details. The court concluded the witness was providing false testimony to assist the plaintiffs, and no further cross-examination was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts