STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL P.S. vs Shreedhara — 8831/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,34,341,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510123252022
e-Filing Number
15-09-2022
Filing Number
8833/2022
Filing Date
15-Sep-2022
Registration No
8831/2022
Registration Date
16-Sep-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
02-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0067
Police Station
NANJANAGUD RURAL PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BY NANJANGUD RURAL P.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shreedhara
-
2.Nagamma
-
3.Shobha
-
4.Mangalamma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-May-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 8831/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Shreedhara, Nagamma, Shobha, and Mangamma) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 341, 323, 324, and 506 with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (PW1/complainant Mahadevu) testified that the defendants merely quarreled with him over a shop rent dispute but denied being abused, beaten, threatened with death, or unlawfully restrained. His testimony did not support any of the criminal allegations. Since the prosecution could not establish the essential ingredients of the offenses charged, the defendants were entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Disposed
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Apr-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Feb-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Dec-2025
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Apr-2025
ChargeView PDF
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
29-Jan-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
25-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Sep-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
30-May-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-May-2024
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Feb-2024
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Nov-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
11-Sep-2023
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Apr-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Apr-2023
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Dec-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 8831/2022
Case Summary: 8831/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four defendants (Shreedhara, Nagamma, Shobha, and Mangamma) of charges under IPC Sections 504, 341, 323, 324, and 506 with Section 34. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The primary witness (PW1/complainant Mahadevu) testified that the defendants merely quarreled with him over a shop rent dispute but denied being abused, beaten, threatened with death, or unlawfully restrained. His testimony did not support any of the criminal allegations. Since the prosecution could not establish the essential ingredients of the offenses charged, the defendants were entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts