STATE BY EXCISE P.S vs RAVI — 8816/2022

Case under Excise Acts Section 32(1), 38(A). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510123032022

Filing Number

8823/2022

Filing Date

15-Sep-2022

Registration No

8816/2022

Registration Date

15-Sep-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Excise Acts Section 32(1), 38(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE BY EXCISE P.S

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVI

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 22-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 19-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 24-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

    In Case 8816/2022 before the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Nanjangud, the petitioner (State by Excise P.S) challenged the investigation into respondent Ravi on an excise matter. The court found serious procedural and evidentiary deficiencies in the investigation, including improper documentation, lack of proper search warrant procedures, fabrication of evidence at the police station rather than at the scene, and missing chemical test reports. The court dismissed the petition and found no grounds for further inquiry, concluding there was no reopening of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 24-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 06-Aug-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  20. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 14-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 08-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 25-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 20-Jun-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 11-Apr-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 07-Mar-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 18-Jan-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 30-Nov-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 15-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 15-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8816/2022

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 8816/2022 before the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Nanjangud, the petitioner (State by Excise P.S) challenged the investigation into respondent Ravi on an excise matter. The court found serious procedural and evidentiary deficiencies in the investigation, including improper documentation, lack of proper search warrant procedures, fabrication of evidence at the police station rather than at the scene, and missing chemical test reports. The court dismissed the petition and found no grounds for further inquiry, concluding there was no reopening of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case