SUNDRAMMA vs H.S. PAPANNA Advocate - KUMARA — 7/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510094472021
Filing Number
514/2021
Filing Date
23-12-2021
Registration No
7/2022
Registration Date
05-01-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNDRAMMA
Adv. SANTHOSHKUMAR. G.S.
PALLAVI MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER SUNDRAMMA
GURUPRASAD D M MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER SUNDRAMMA
Respondent(s)
H.S. PAPANNA Advocate - KUMARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S. 7/2022 The plaintiffs (Sundramma and two minors represented by her) and defendant H.S. Papanna reached a settlement compromise whereby the plaintiffs paid Rs. 6,75,000 to the defendant. The Lok Adalat approved the settlement and dismissed the suit as settled, while directing full refund of court fees to the first plaintiff in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 7/2022 The plaintiffs (Sundramma and two minors represented by her) and defendant H.S. Papanna reached a settlement compromise whereby the plaintiffs paid Rs. 6,75,000 to the defendant. The Lok Adalat approved the settlement and dismissed the suit as settled, while directing full refund of court fees to the first plaintiff in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts