VIJAYARAJ vs N. GOVINDARAJU Advocate - K.S.LOKESHA — 4710/2022
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510071152022
Filing Number
4712/2022
Filing Date
01-06-2022
Registration No
4710/2022
Registration Date
01-06-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAYARAJ
Adv. TARAKARAMAN. K.
Respondent(s)
N. GOVINDARAJU Advocate - K.S.LOKESHA
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 23-02-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 06-01-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 29-12-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo wherein the complainant (Vijayaraj) and the accused mutually settled their dispute amicably, with both parties duly signing the settlement. The court disposed of case 4710/2022 as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo satisfactory and in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo wherein the complainant (Vijayaraj) and the accused mutually settled their dispute amicably, with both parties duly signing the settlement. The court disposed of case 4710/2022 as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo satisfactory and in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts