RANGASWAMY vs THE TAHASILDAR — 2180/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 22nd April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS510069022025
Filing Number
2160/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
2180/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
450-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
22-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANGASWAMY
Adv. PURUSHOTHAMA K P
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Rangaswamy v. The Tahasildar (CRL.MISC./2180/2025) The court allowed Rangaswamy's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register his father Bokalaiah's death (dated 16.02.1995) in the official death register. The petitioner's family had failed to register the death due to procedural ignorance. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, genealogical records, and Aadhaar documentation, and directed the Tahasildar to register the death upon receipt of prescribed fees, enabling the petitioner to obtain mutation entries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
For Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Feb-2026
Notice To Respondent
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2180/2025
Case Summary: Rangaswamy v. The Tahasildar (CRL.MISC./2180/2025) The court allowed Rangaswamy's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register his father Bokalaiah's death (dated 16.02.1995) in the official death register. The petitioner's family had failed to register the death due to procedural ignorance. The court found sufficient grounds based on the petitioner's unchallenged testimony, genealogical records, and Aadhaar documentation, and directed the Tahasildar to register the death upon receipt of prescribed fees, enabling the petitioner to obtain mutation entries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts