PUTTA ARASAMMA vs THE TAHASILDAR — 2179/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510069012025

Filing Number

2159/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

2179/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUTTA ARASAMMA

    Adv. PURUSHOTHAMA K P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by Putta Arasamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The petitioner sought registration of her mother Siddamma's death (04.08.1978) in the death register after the family failed to report it due to procedural ignorance. The court, finding the petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence unchallenged and finding no public objections after newspaper publication, directed the Tahasildar to register the death upon receipt of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Orders

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2179/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Putta Arasamma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. The petitioner sought registration of her mother Siddamma's death (04.08.1978) in the death register after the family failed to report it due to procedural ignorance. The court, finding the petitioner's testimony and documentary evidence unchallenged and finding no public objections after newspaper publication, directed the Tahasildar to register the death upon receipt of prescribed fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case