NANJUNDASWAMY vs THE TAHASILDAR — 2159/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAMS510068632025
Filing Number
2141/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
2159/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
450-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANJUNDASWAMY
Adv. CHIKKANNA H.M.
-
2.MAHADEVASWAMY
-
3.GURUSIDDAMMA
-
4.MAHALAKSHMI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE TAHASILDAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 2159/2025 The court granted the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Gurusiddaiah (dated 01.03.1995) in the official death register. The petitioners failed to report the death due to procedural ignorance but now required the death certificate to obtain property mutation entries. The court found sufficient grounds to allow the petition based on unchallenged testimony, genealogical documentation, and the respondent's default appearance, noting no injustice would result from registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Jan-2026
For Enquiry
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2159/2025
Case Summary: 2159/2025 The court granted the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Gurusiddaiah (dated 01.03.1995) in the official death register. The petitioners failed to report the death due to procedural ignorance but now required the death certificate to obtain property mutation entries. The court found sufficient grounds to allow the petition based on unchallenged testimony, genealogical documentation, and the respondent's default appearance, noting no injustice would result from registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts