CHANDRASHEKARA MURTHY vs UMESHA. M — 4600/2022
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510067932022
Filing Number
4602/2022
Filing Date
09-05-2022
Registration No
4600/2022
Registration Date
09-05-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRASHEKARA MURTHY
Adv. SIDDARAJU. R.M.
Respondent(s)
UMESHA. M
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 05-01-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 11-11-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 4600/2022 Summary The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by petitioner Chandrashekara Murthy and respondent Umesha M, who had mutually settled the dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 4600/2022 Summary The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by petitioner Chandrashekara Murthy and respondent Umesha M, who had mutually settled the dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts