CHANDRASHEKARA MURTHY vs UMESHA. M — 4600/2022

Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510067932022

Filing Number

4602/2022

Filing Date

09-May-2022

Registration No

4600/2022

Registration Date

09-May-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRASHEKARA MURTHY

    Adv. SIDDARAJU. R.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UMESHA. M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 4600/2022 Summary The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by petitioner Chandrashekara Murthy and respondent Umesha M, who had mutually settled the dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 29-Sep-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 09-Jun-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 05-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 24-Feb-2025

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 27-Jan-2025

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 09-Dec-2024

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 21-Oct-2024

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 04-Mar-2024

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 22-Dec-2023

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 18-Oct-2023

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 11-Sep-2023

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 24-Jul-2023

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 19-Jun-2023

    Cross Of Pw/Dw

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 05-Apr-2023

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 03-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 28-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 06-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 16-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 12-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 07-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 19-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  34. 12-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  35. 04-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  36. 09-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 09-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4600/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 4600/2022 Summary The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by petitioner Chandrashekara Murthy and respondent Umesha M, who had mutually settled the dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case