ARJUN K vs RAMESH — 498/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223,138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--PCR IS REGISTERED AS C.C. on 07th March 2026.
P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS
CNR: KAMS510063592025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
516/2025
Filing Date
08-12-2025
Registration No
498/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PCR IS REGISTERED AS C.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJUN K
Adv. M CHINNASWAMY
Respondent(s)
RAMESH
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SWORN STATEMENT
FOR SWORN STATEMENT
FOR SWORN STATEMENT
FOR SWORN STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-02-2026 | FOR SWORN STATEMENT | |
| 29-12-2025 | FOR SWORN STATEMENT | |
| 27-12-2025 | FOR SWORN STATEMENT | |
| 08-12-2025 | FOR SWORN STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court took cognizance of a cheque bouncing case (PCR 498/2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After examining the complainant's affidavit and verifying supporting documents including the cheque (no. 842841), bank endorsements, legal notice, and postal receipts, the court found prima facie evidence against the accused. The case was registered as a criminal complaint, and summons will be issued to the accused through registered post if the prescribed fee is paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court took cognizance of a cheque bouncing case (PCR 498/2025) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After examining the complainant's affidavit and verifying supporting documents including the cheque (no. 842841), bank endorsements, legal notice, and postal receipts, the court found prima facie evidence against the accused. The case was registered as a criminal complaint, and summons will be issued to the accused through registered post if the prescribed fee is paid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts