B. PREETHAM vs NIRAJAN MISHRA Advocate - GANESH. P.N. — 4439/2022
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510062032022
Filing Number
4440/2022
Filing Date
21-03-2022
Registration No
4439/2022
Registration Date
21-03-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B. PREETHAM
Adv. KUMAR. S.
Respondent(s)
NIRAJAN MISHRA Advocate - GANESH. P.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
NBW TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 14-01-2026 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 22-12-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
| 03-11-2025 | NBW TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
In Case 4439/2022 before the Lok Adalat, petitioner B. Preetham and respondent Nirajan Mishra reached a mutual compromise and settled the matter amicably outside court. The Lok Adalat accepted the compromise memo, finding it duly signed by both parties and in the interest of justice and equity. The case was disposed of as settled and not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Case 4439/2022 before the Lok Adalat, petitioner B. Preetham and respondent Nirajan Mishra reached a mutual compromise and settled the matter amicably outside court. The Lok Adalat accepted the compromise memo, finding it duly signed by both parties and in the interest of justice and equity. The case was disposed of as settled and not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts