C.R. MANJUNATH vs MALLIKARJUNA Advocate - N ARAVINDA KUMAR — 4418/2022

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section U/S.200OFCR.PC. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510061512022

Filing Number

4419/2022

Filing Date

16-Mar-2022

Registration No

4418/2022

Registration Date

16-Mar-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section U/S.200OFCR.PC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.R. MANJUNATH

    Adv. ASHWATH. B.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MALLIKARJUNA Advocate - N ARAVINDA KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by both petitioner C.R. Manjunath and respondent Mallikarjuna Advocate N Aravinda Kumar, who had mutually settled their dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo satisfactory and in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 18-Oct-2025

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 18-Jul-2025

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 19-Apr-2025

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 18-Jan-2025

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 19-Oct-2024

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 18-Jul-2024

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  13. 18-Apr-2024

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  14. 13-Mar-2024

    Balance

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  15. 05-Mar-2024

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  16. 24-Jan-2024

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  17. 09-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  18. 27-Nov-2023

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  19. 30-Oct-2023

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  20. 25-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  21. 28-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  22. 17-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  23. 22-May-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  24. 20-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  25. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  26. 16-Jan-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  27. 14-Nov-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  28. 18-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  29. 25-May-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  30. 22-Apr-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  31. 19-Apr-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  32. 11-Apr-2022

    Await Summons/Notice

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  33. 16-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 16-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4418/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat accepted a compromise memo signed by both petitioner C.R. Manjunath and respondent Mallikarjuna Advocate N Aravinda Kumar, who had mutually settled their dispute amicably outside court. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo satisfactory and in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case