GOWRAMMA vs MAHADEVAMMA — 479/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O7,RULE1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS510049232025

Filing Number

480/2025

Filing Date

17-Sep-2025

Registration No

479/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O7,RULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOWRAMMA

    Adv. CHELUVA SWAMY

  2. 2.YASHODHA

  3. 3.NEELAMANI.A.R

  4. 4.LATHA.A.R

  5. 5.JAYARAMANAYAKA

  6. 6.NAGAMMA

  7. 7.MANGALAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAMMA

  2. 2.CHANDRI

  3. 3.MAHADEVANAYAKA

  4. 4.RAJESHA

Case History

  1. 29-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Deposition

    Case Summary Case No: O.S. 479/2025, 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanjangud Outcome: The case proceeded to main hearing with plaintiff's evidence presented through affidavit (dated 07-03-2026). Documentary exhibits including computerized RTCs, order sheets from O.S. 114/17, and settlement petition filed jointly by both parties were admitted and marked as exhibits. No objections raised by the defendant, and the court proceeded ex-parte as the defendant failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 479/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: O.S. 479/2025, 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Nanjangud Outcome: The case proceeded to main hearing with plaintiff's evidence presented through affidavit (dated 07-03-2026). Documentary exhibits including computerized RTCs, order sheets from O.S. 114/17, and settlement petition filed jointly by both parties were admitted and marked as exhibits. No objections raised by the defendant, and the court proceeded ex-parte as the defendant failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case