Kavalande police vs Murthy — 1950/2014

Case under U/o Xxi Rule 54 of Cpc Section 498AR/w149IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510048532014

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Date

09-12-2014

Registration No

1950/2014

Registration Date

09-12-2014

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

KAVALANDE PS

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

U/O XXI rule 54 of CPC Section 498AR/w149IPC

Petitioner(s)

Kavalande police

Respondent(s)

Murthy

Kamalamma

kekke siddaiah

Ningaraju

Rekha

Rangaswamy

Putta

Hearing History

Judge: 450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

07-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

11-02-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

27-01-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

24-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 149 (unlawful assembly), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish the charges despite testimony from the victim and investigating officers, as direct eyewitness accounts were contradicted and the evidence was deemed weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-02-2021
Deposition
20-07-2015
Charge
12-06-2023
Deposition
18-07-2023
Deposition
18-07-2023
Deposition
11-06-2024
Deposition
11-02-2026
313 Statement
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all seven accused of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 149 (unlawful assembly), finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish the charges despite testimony from the victim and investigating officers, as direct eyewitness accounts were contradicted and the evidence was deemed weak. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case