M UMA vs MADESHA M — 1238/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510044832024

Filing Number

1242/2024

Filing Date

10-Dec-2024

Registration No

1238/2024

Registration Date

10-Dec-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M UMA

    Adv. GANESH. P.N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADESHA M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In Case 1238/2024 (M UMA v. MADESHA M), the Lok Adalat disposed of the matter after the petitioner and respondent reached a mutual settlement and compromise. The court accepted the signed compromise memo in the interest of justice and equity, ordering the case as settled and not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 13-Oct-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 28-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 19-Apr-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1238/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 1238/2024 (M UMA v. MADESHA M), the Lok Adalat disposed of the matter after the petitioner and respondent reached a mutual settlement and compromise. The court accepted the signed compromise memo in the interest of justice and equity, ordering the case as settled and not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case