MAHADEVASWAMY vs 1.SMT. NAGAMMA — 630/2014

Case under U/o 43 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS510042992014

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

630/2014

Filing Date

13-11-2014

Registration No

630/2014

Registration Date

14-11-2014

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Acts & Sections

U/O 43 RULE 1 OF CPC Section 1

Petitioner(s)

MAHADEVASWAMY

Adv. K.S.MRUTHUNJAYA

NINGANNASWAMY

CHINNAMMA

Respondent(s)

1.SMT. NAGAMMA

2.SIDDARAJU

3.SOMANNA

4.BASAVANNA

5.RAJANNA

6.NINGANNA

7.MALLANNA

Hearing History

Judge: 450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE

08-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

15-04-2015

Orders

23-07-2016
Deposition
10-08-2016
Deposition
11-07-2019
Deposition
13-12-2019
Orders
10-02-2020
Deposition
12-11-2020
Deposition
25-11-2020
Deposition
23-01-2016
Issue
04-12-2025
Deposition

Summary: In OS 630/2014, the court examined evidence regarding the relationship between the parties under NI Act sections 19 and 24. The court found that Section 19 documents were properly produced to establish lineage through a family tree (vansavriksha), and Section 20 evidence was filed in court as required. The court determined that sections 19 and 24 were appropriately invoked for this case, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS 630/2014, the court examined evidence regarding the relationship between the parties under NI Act sections 19 and 24. The court found that Section 19 documents were properly produced to establish lineage through a family tree (vansavriksha), and Section 20 evidence was filed in court as required. The court determined that sections 19 and 24 were appropriately invoked for this case, and the matter was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case