SANNAPPA vs RATHNAMMA — 483/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 RULE 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510041872024
Filing Number
483/2024
Filing Date
21-Nov-2024
Registration No
483/2024
Registration Date
22-Nov-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANNAPPA
Adv. SIDDARAJU. R.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.RATHNAMMA
-
2.PUTTAMADAPPA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In case O.S. 483/24 between SANNAPPA (petitioner) and RATHNAMMA and PUTTAMADAPPA (respondents), the Lok Adalat approved an out-of-court settlement signed by all parties. The court directed the office to refund the entire court fee to the plaintiff in accordance with law, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Mar-2026
For Settlement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Mar-2026
For Settlement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 483/2024
In case O.S. 483/24 between SANNAPPA (petitioner) and RATHNAMMA and PUTTAMADAPPA (respondents), the Lok Adalat approved an out-of-court settlement signed by all parties. The court directed the office to refund the entire court fee to the plaintiff in accordance with law, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts