B.S. RAVINDRAKUMAR vs S. NAGANNA — 64/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI, R II. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAMS510038812025

Filing Number

64/2025

Filing Date

02-Aug-2025

Registration No

64/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O XXI, R II

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.B.S. RAVINDRAKUMAR

    Adv. M.C.DILEEPKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S. NAGANNA

  2. 2.MAHADEVAMMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Case 64/2025 before the Lok Adalath (community conciliation forum) was closed as fully satisfied. The respondent (Jdr) paid the entire amount claimed by the petitioner (Dhr), and upon filing a memo to this effect, the Lok Adalath closed the petition, resolving the dispute through settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    For Settlement

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    Balance

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 25-Oct-2025

    Balance

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 20-Sep-2025

    Balance

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 23-Aug-2025

    Orders

  9. 23-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  10. 19-Aug-2025

    Order On IA

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    Order On IA

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 64/2025 before the Lok Adalath (community conciliation forum) was closed as fully satisfied. The respondent (Jdr) paid the entire amount claimed by the petitioner (Dhr), and upon filing a memo to this effect, the Lok Adalath closed the petition, resolving the dispute through settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case