A.M. SIDDAPPA vs RANGASHETTY — 46/2021
Case under Under Order 21 Rule 2 of Cpc Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS510037272021
Filing Number
46/2021
Filing Date
14-08-2021
Registration No
46/2021
Registration Date
16-08-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A.M. SIDDAPPA
Adv. SHREEKANTA. M.
Respondent(s)
RANGASHETTY
Nagaraju
Ravi
Chowdamma
Neelamma
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
FOR SETTLEMENT
BALANCE
BALANCE
BALANCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 09-03-2026 | BALANCE |
| 26-02-2026 | BALANCE |
| 17-01-2026 | BALANCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 46/2021 Summary: The Lok Adalat dismissed the petition as not pressed and closed after both parties filed a joint memo confirming amicable settlement. The Decree Holder confirmed receipt of the full claimed amount from the Judgment Debtor and expressed satisfaction, leading to the court's dismissal order based on the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 46/2021 Summary: The Lok Adalat dismissed the petition as not pressed and closed after both parties filed a joint memo confirming amicable settlement. The Decree Holder confirmed receipt of the full claimed amount from the Judgment Debtor and expressed satisfaction, leading to the court's dismissal order based on the settlement agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts