B. NAGARAJ vs M. PUNEETH — 1045/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510037122024
Filing Number
1047/2024
Filing Date
10-Oct-2024
Registration No
1045/2024
Registration Date
10-Oct-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B. NAGARAJ
Adv. KUMAR. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. PUNEETH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In case 1045/2024 (B. Nagaraj v. M. Puneeth), the Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement between the petitioner and respondent. The court found the compromise memo duly signed and satisfied with the stated reasons, and disposed of the case as settled and not pressed in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Feb-2026
For Settlement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Feb-2026
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Jan-2026
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Nov-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Sep-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Jun-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Mar-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Jan-2025
NBW To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1045/2024
In case 1045/2024 (B. Nagaraj v. M. Puneeth), the Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement between the petitioner and respondent. The court found the compromise memo duly signed and satisfied with the stated reasons, and disposed of the case as settled and not pressed in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts