SRI VEERASHIVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY BASAPPA vs RAJASHEKARMURTHY — 949/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510033662024
Filing Number
956/2024
Filing Date
09-Sep-2024
Registration No
949/2024
Registration Date
09-Sep-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI VEERASHIVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY BASAPPA
Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJASHEKARMURTHY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 949/2024 Summary: The Lok Adalat disposed of the case between Sri Veerashiva Credit Co Operative Society and Rajashekarmurthy after the parties reached a mutual compromise and settlement. The court accepted the compromise memo signed by both parties and disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Feb-2026
For Settlement
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Jan-2026
Ss To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Nov-2025
Ss To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Sep-2025
Ss To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Jun-2025
Ss To Accused
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Feb-2025
Appearance Of Accussed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Dec-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 949/2024
Case 949/2024 Summary: The Lok Adalat disposed of the case between Sri Veerashiva Credit Co Operative Society and Rajashekarmurthy after the parties reached a mutual compromise and settlement. The court accepted the compromise memo signed by both parties and disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts