Sudhamani vs Shivabasappa Advocate - ASHWATH. B.S. — 473/2016
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 1. Status: FOR AMENDMENT. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510026092016
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
474/2016
Filing Date
12-08-2016
Registration No
473/2016
Registration Date
18-08-2016
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhamani
Adv. MAHESH. P.
Kanyakumari
Respondent(s)
Shivabasappa Advocate - ASHWATH. B.S.
L.S. Mahesh
Adv. ASHWATH. B.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 450-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
FOR AMENDMENT
ORDERS
OBJECTION TO IA
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FOR AMENDMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 13-02-2026 | OBJECTION TO IA | |
| 30-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.2 under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking amendment to the written statement in a partition suit (OS.872/2018) was allowed. The court found that the proposed amendment to correct the property measurement (from 1 Acre 0.20 guntas to 1 Acre 0.12 guntas as per RTC) was necessary for proper adjudication and determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. The amendment was permitted with a cost of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed by Defendant No.2 under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking amendment to the written statement in a partition suit (OS.872/2018) was allowed. The court found that the proposed amendment to correct the property measurement (from 1 Acre 0.20 guntas to 1 Acre 0.12 guntas as per RTC) was necessary for proper adjudication and determining the real questions in controversy between the parties. The amendment was permitted with a cost of Rs. 500/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts