RAMU vs SHOBHA T S — 1293/2021
Case under Under Sec. 200 of Cr.p.c R/w 138 , 142 of N.i Act. Section 138. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAMS510022922021
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1295/2021
Filing Date
10-06-2021
Registration No
1293/2021
Registration Date
10-06-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMU
Adv. KUMARA
Respondent(s)
SHOBHA T S
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 18-03-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-01-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a court order from the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Nanjangud (Karnataka) in case CC No. 1293-2021, dated 06-01-2025. The court admitted multiple documents and evidence from related criminal cases (CC 309/2020, PCR 394/2020, PCR 288/2020, PCR 109/2021, CC 1319/2021, CC 611/2020, CC 3999/2021, PCR 383/2020, CC 52/2021, PCR 438/2021, and CC 63/2021) into the record as exhibits. The proceedings continued with examination of witnesses and case documents, with the court noting that the accused's counsel requested and was granted additional time for the cross-examination phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a court order from the 2nd Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Nanjangud (Karnataka) in case CC No. 1293-2021, dated 06-01-2025. The court admitted multiple documents and evidence from related criminal cases (CC 309/2020, PCR 394/2020, PCR 288/2020, PCR 109/2021, CC 1319/2021, CC 611/2020, CC 3999/2021, PCR 383/2020, CC 52/2021, PCR 438/2021, and CC 63/2021) into the record as exhibits. The proceedings continued with examination of witnesses and case documents, with the court noting that the accused's counsel requested and was granted additional time for the cross-examination phase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts