GANGAMANI vs THE TAHASILDAR — 812/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510021042025

Filing Number

792/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

812/2025

Registration Date

26-May-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

450-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 08-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGAMANI

    Adv. P MAHESHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE TAHASILDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court dismissed the petition filed on 26.05.2025 as non prosecution because the petitioner remained absent during court hearings despite the case being called multiple times. The court inferred from the petitioner's repeated absence that they lacked interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    Steps

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 27-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  9. 26-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 812/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed on 26.05.2025 as non prosecution because the petitioner remained absent during court hearings despite the case being called multiple times. The court inferred from the petitioner's repeated absence that they lacked interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case