C.E.O. PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., vs C. MANJUNATH — 36/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21R2. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS510020412024
Filing Number
36/2024
Filing Date
01-Jun-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
04-Jun-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.C.E.O. PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,
Adv. MRUTHUNJAYA. K.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.C. MANJUNATH
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Execution Petition 36/2024 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Nanjanagudu Date: 4th April, 2026 Parties: - Decree Holder: CEO, Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited - Judgment Debtor: C. Manjunath - Objector: Sri. Rangaswamy Shetty Outcome: The application filed by objector Sri. Rangaswamy Shetty under Order 21 Rules 97 and 101 CPC is rejected. The court found that the objector claimed possession of the property through the judgment debtor (not independently) and was therefore not entitled to raise objections in execution proceedings. The court determined the objector's claims were contradictory, fabricated, and amounted to an abuse of process designed to delay decree execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
25-Mar-2026
Order On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
25-Feb-2026
Order On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
19-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
03-Dec-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Nov-2025
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
25-Oct-2025
For Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Sep-2025
For Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
10-Sep-2025
For Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Sep-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
18-Aug-2025
Objection To IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Aug-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
24-Jul-2025
Objection To IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Jun-2025
Objection To IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
11-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
05-Jun-2025
Hearing
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
27-Mar-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Mar-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
31-Jan-2025
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
23-Jan-2025
Objection To IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
07-Dec-2024
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
22-Aug-2024
For Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Aug-2024
For Objection
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Jul-2024
Notice To Respondent
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
04-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2024
Case Summary: Execution Petition 36/2024 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Nanjanagudu Date: 4th April, 2026 Parties: - Decree Holder: CEO, Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society Limited - Judgment Debtor: C. Manjunath - Objector: Sri. Rangaswamy Shetty Outcome: The application filed by objector Sri. Rangaswamy Shetty under Order 21 Rules 97 and 101 CPC is rejected. The court found that the objector claimed possession of the property through the judgment debtor (not independently) and was therefore not entitled to raise objections in execution proceedings. The court determined the objector's claims were contradictory, fabricated, and amounted to an abuse of process designed to delay decree execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts