SHIVANNANAYAKA vs RAJANAYAKA and others — 312/2017
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7R1. Status: FOR SETTLEMENT. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510019712017
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
316/2017
Filing Date
30-06-2017
Registration No
312/2017
Registration Date
30-06-2017
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHIVANNANAYAKA
Adv. S C SHANTHANAGARAJU
Respondent(s)
RAJANAYAKA and others
MAHADEVANAIKA
KRISHNANAYAKA
N R RAJANNA
S R MAHADEVANAYAKA
PUNEETH
POORVITH
Hearing History
Judge: 1098-II ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
FOR SETTLEMENT
CALL ON
FOR SETTLEMENT
FOR SETTLEMENT
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 14-03-2026 | CALL ON |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR SETTLEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 312/2017 (Shivannanayaka v. Rajanayaka & others) This is a property dispute case heard in the 2nd Additional District Court of Nanjangud. The court examined claims regarding the valuation of three items of property at the time of filing. The court found that Item 1 was valued at Rs. 500, Item 2 at Rs. 5,00,000 (though petitioner claimed 10-15 lakhs), and Item 3's valuation at approximately Rs. 20,000-50,000 based on investigation evidence. The court allowed the petition, accepting the petitioner's arguments regarding the property division and documentation, with no further hearing ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 312/2017 (Shivannanayaka v. Rajanayaka & others) This is a property dispute case heard in the 2nd Additional District Court of Nanjangud. The court examined claims regarding the valuation of three items of property at the time of filing. The court found that Item 1 was valued at Rs. 500, Item 2 at Rs. 5,00,000 (though petitioner claimed 10-15 lakhs), and Item 3's valuation at approximately Rs. 20,000-50,000 based on investigation evidence. The court allowed the petition, accepting the petitioner's arguments regarding the property division and documentation, with no further hearing ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts