MAHADEVAPPA D vs THE THAHASILDHAR — 540/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAMS510016242026

Filing Number

451/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

540/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAPPA D

    Adv. CHINNASWAMY. C.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THAHASILDHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  4. 25-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Mahadevappa D's petition under Section 13 of the Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his birth date as 20.08.1965 at Hediyala Village. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony and supporting documents (school records, PAN card, Aadhaar card) established that his birth was never registered due to his parents' ignorance, and the respondent's default appearance strengthened his case. The registration shall be completed after collecting the requisite late fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Call On

    Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Mahadevappa D's petition under Section 13 of the Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register his birth date as 20.08.1965 at Hediyala Village. The petitioner's unchallenged testimony and supporting documents (school records, PAN card, Aadhaar card) established that his birth was never registered due to his parents' ignorance, and the respondent's default appearance strengthened his case. The registration shall be completed after collecting the requisite late fee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case