SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY vs H.M. SHANKARA — 563/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAMS510015062025

Filing Number

563/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

563/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

1098-II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI VEERASHYVA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY

    Adv. BASAVARAJU. C.L.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.M. SHANKARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    In case 563/2025 between Sri Veerashyva Credit Co Operative Society (petitioner) and H.M. Shankara (respondent), the Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement signed by both parties. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    For Settlement

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 27-Sep-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    II Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 08-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 563/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In case 563/2025 between Sri Veerashyva Credit Co Operative Society (petitioner) and H.M. Shankara (respondent), the Lok Adalat accepted a mutual compromise settlement signed by both parties. The court disposed of the case as settled and not pressed, finding the compromise memo acceptable in the interest of justice and equity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case